Post your question in the Comment section below, and a GRE expert will answer it as fast as humanly possible.
- Video Course
- Video Course Overview
- General GRE Info and Strategies - 7 videos (free)
- Quantitative Comparison - 7 videos (free)
- Arithmetic - 42 videos
- Powers and Roots - 43 videos
- Algebra and Equation Solving - 78 videos
- Word Problems - 54 videos
- Geometry - 48 videos
- Integer Properties - 34 videos
- Statistics - 28 videos
- Counting - 27 videos
- Probability - 25 videos
- Data Interpretation - 24 videos
- Analytical Writing - 9 videos (free)
- Sentence Equivalence - 39 videos (free)
- Text Completion - 51 videos
- Reading Comprehension - 16 videos
- Study Guide
- Philosophy
- Office Hours
- Extras
- Prices
Comment on General Strategy - Part 1
what is the meaning of "let
In this case, it means the
In this case, it means the same as "release" or "let out."
Where is Brent? The voice
Ha! That's a friend of mine
Ha! That's a friend of mine who lent a hand with narration. He also wanted try out a different layout.
Cheers,
Brent
Hi I had a question for you.
Thanks
For each Verbal section (20
For each Verbal section (20 questions per section), you can expect to see:
- 4 or 5 Sentence Equivalence questions
- 5 or 6 Text Completion questions
- 10 Reading Comprehension questions
Cheers,
Brent
Thank you :)
Hi Brent,
For this question
https://gre.myprepclub.com/forum/unfortunately-his-damaging-attacks-on-the-ramifications-of-14709.html
what is the clue phrases that lead to the answer choice ?
and how is the 1st part of the sentence is connected to the last part ?
Thanks!
Question link: https:/
Question link: https://gre.myprepclub.com/forum/unfortunately-his-damaging-attacks-on-t...
"Unfortunately, his damaging attacks on the ramifications of the economic policy have been (i) _______ by his wholehearted acceptance of that policy's underlying assumptions."
The sentence tells us that:
- The person is AGAINST the ramifications of the policy
- The person is FOR the policy's underlying assumptions
There's some discontinuity here: the person strongly favors the policy's assumptions, BUT he's against the policy's ramifications.
So, we can say that being AGAINST the policy's ramifications UNDERMINES the fact that he's FOR the policy's assumptions.
Does that help?
Thank you of the explanation.
https://gre.myprepclub.com/forum
In this question, shouldn't the word "stunningly" set up a contrast to the limited minded host ? based on that assumption, I biked farsighted for the 1st blank, which turned out to be wrong.
Question link: https:/
Question link: https://gre.myprepclub.com/forum/the-limits-of-the-show-however-are-less...
The limits of the show, however, are less consequential than the limits of its host. Her approach to the family crises described by the guests is stunningly (i)_____; it's the narrowness of her repertoire that leads her to (ii)_____ the important questions, not the constraints of the medium.
The first sentence says that the show is bad, but the host is even worse.
The first blank describes the host's approach to the family crises.
Now that we know the host is awful, we need a negative word for the first blank.
FARSIGHTED and PERCEPTIVE are both positive words. This leaves only SIMPLEMINDED.
I can see how you might feel that STUNNINGLY might set up a contrast. However, in this context, it's synonymous with VERY, SHOCKINGLY, INCREDIBLY, etc
Cheers,
Brent