Post your question in the Comment section below, and a GRE expert will answer it as fast as humanly possible.

- Video Course
- Video Course Overview
- General GRE Info and Strategies - 7 videos (free)
- Quantitative Comparison - 7 videos (free)
- Arithmetic - 42 videos
- Powers and Roots - 43 videos
- Algebra and Equation Solving - 78 videos
- Word Problems - 54 videos
- Geometry - 48 videos
- Integer Properties - 34 videos
- Statistics - 28 videos
- Counting - 27 videos
- Probability - 25 videos
- Data Interpretation - 24 videos
- Analytical Writing - 9 videos (free)
- Sentence Equivalence - 39 videos (free)
- Text Completion - 51 videos
- Reading Comprehension - 16 videos

- Study Guide
- Philosophy
- Office Hours
- Extras
- Prices

## Comment on

Nick, Mack and Chad## how about like this, since

let age of Mack be = M

let age of Nick be= M+9

let age of Chad be = (M+9)-12= M-3

Quantity A => Mack age in 2 years = M+2

Quantity B => Chad age 1 year ago = M-3

subtracting M from both quantities we get

QA QB

2 > -3

therefore QA> QB

hence A answer

## That looks great. You made

That looks great. You made one small mistake though.

Chad's age 1 year ago = (M-3)-1 = M-4

## alright thanks :)

## So I have another way

Macks age: M

Nicks age: M+9

Chads age: (M+9)-12-1 ( Basically took nick's age which is m+9 , minus 12 )

I then solved M+9-12=0

M-3=0

M=3

I then substituted M for Qty A and B , and found Qty A to be greater and hence chose A

## Perfect!

Perfect!

## I thought on CQ's you couldn

## Adding and subtracting

Adding and subtracting variables is perfectly valid when solving Quantitative Comparison questions. More here: https://www.greenlighttestprep.com/module/gre-quantitative-comparison/vi...

## N = M+9

C = N-12

M = N-9+2 = N-7

C = N-12-1 = N-13

bigger quantity subtraction will yield smaller quantity

so (A)

## Awesome! The tables work

## Thanks, I used before the

## Can we write everything

N=M+9

N=C+12

Then we can see M must be older than C and deduce that M's age in two years will clearly be greater than C's age a year ago. Or am I missing a concept somewhere?

## That's a great approach! Pure

That's a great approach! Pure logic and number sense!

## In the given question -

N = 9+M

C = 12-N

N# NICK M#MACK C#CHAD

if current age is 100 for M then -> M=100, N=109, C=97

if Mack's age after 2 years is 102, then N=111, C=99.

And Nicks 1yr ago age is 98. here 102>98 hence A.

How about this solution Brent? Is it a valid one?

## Your equation C = 12 - N does

Your equation C = 12 - N does not match the given information.

We're told that Chad is 12 years younger than Nick.

So, for example, it could be the case that Chad is 3 and Nick is 15.

In other words, C = 3 and N = 15

When we plug these values into your equation, C = 12 - N, we get: 3 = 12 - 15, which is not true (12 - 15 = -3, not 3).

Likewise, it could be the case that Chad is 20 and Nick is 32.

However when we plug these values into your equation, we get: 20 = 12 - 32, which is not true.

The same applies to the values you are using: M = 100, N = 109, C = 97.

If we plug N = 109, C = 97 into your equation, we get: 97 = 12 - 109, which is not true.

If Chad is 12 years younger than Nick, then the correct equation is: C = N - 12

Does that help?

## Thanks Understood!!